Historical past factors to the US as perpetrator of Disaster in Ukraine

0
30
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp



“We wish to remind you that Russia has by no means attacked anybody all through its historical past.” Dmitri Peskov, Kremlin spokesman


“NATO leaders are actually engaged in probably the most blatant and irresponsible destabilisation and hybrid battle operation since they used Islamic terrorists to destroy Libya and tried to make use of them to interrupt up Syria.” Nick Griffin, political analyst and former Member of the European Parliament, Unz Evaluation

Right here’s your US International Coverage quiz for the day: Which of those militant organizations has the USA supported through the years?

in article 1
  1. Marxist guerillas in East Syria (The YPG, The Folks’s Safety Items, The Syrian Democratic Forces)
  2. Far-right Neo-Nazis in Ukraine (Ukrainian Safety Companies, Azov Particular Operations Detachment)
  3. Islamic extremists in Syria, Libya, Kosovo, Chechnya and Afghanistan. (aka– Al Qaida, Al Nusra and many others)
  4. Anti-leftist Loss of life Squads in El Salvador and Nicaragua
  5. All the above

In case you picked “Quantity 5”, then pat your self on the again. That’s the proper reply. The US has “armed and educated” all of those disparate teams and nonetheless helps lots of them at present. And the explanation Washington helps them, is as a result of they assist to advance America’s geopolitical agenda. It doesn’t matter if the group is on the “proper” or the “left”. It doesn’t matter if they’re spiritual extremists or Godless atheists. What issues is whether or not they are often become an efficient combating power able to reaching America’s strategic goals. That’s the overriding aim.

Backside line: Ideology is irrelevant. What issues to Washington is energy; pure, iron-fisted energy.

The purpose we try to make, is that different international locations don’t conduct their enterprise like the USA. Russia, for instance, doesn’t see coup d’états, shade revolutions and army aggression as an appropriate method to conduct their international coverage. They like diplomacy, negotiation and compromise. Moscow is dedicated to worldwide regulation, common safety, and the peaceable decision of conflicts. They don’t see aggression or interventionist violence as respectable methods to attain their nationwide pursuits which is why– as Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov mentioned on Saturday– “Russia has by no means attacked anybody in its historical past.”

Let that sink in for a minute: “Russia has by no means attacked anybody in its historical past.”

If that’s true– and it’s true– then what are we to make of the media’s infinite claims that Russia is planning to invade Ukraine?

Both Russia is planning to interrupt with an strategy that dates again centuries or the media is whipping the general public right into a frenzy to create the notion that Russia poses an exterior risk to its neighbors? Which is it?

Most individuals already know the reply to that query as a result of they’ve seen this identical efficiency many occasions earlier than. Sadly, these identical folks could also be overwhelmed by the deluge of fear-mongering pronouncements and dire warnings of an impending battle. Towards their higher judgement, they could really consider the media is telling the reality this time. However the media isn’t telling the reality. There is no such thing as a Russian Boogieman and the Russian military is definitely not going to go on a rampage killing and maiming harmless folks throughout Ukraine. That’s pure fiction.

What is definitely going down isn’t laborious to understand, however, first, we have to perceive is that the audience isn’t the American folks. No. The present psyops is definitely directed at Europe. The aim is to persuade the Europeans that they should strengthen and perpetuate Washington’s safety umbrella (aka- NATO) to guard them from international enemies. The plan can be supposed to drive Europe’s lapdog leaders again into Uncle Sam’s suffocating embrace. These are the goals of the present operation. The US is taking emergency motion to make sure that its European colonies don’t slip out of its financial and political orbit.

Second, Washington is making an attempt to place a wedge between the EU and Russia with a purpose to forestall larger financial integration that might inevitably lead to an enormous free commerce zone spanning Europe and Asia. Washington should sabotage that plan with a purpose to keep its dominant function within the world order. Right here’s extra on the subject by political analyst, Nick Griffin:


“The basic targets of the NATO warmongers on this disaster aren’t Donbass, nor even Russia, however Germany, and China’s One Belt, One Street initiative. They’re making an attempt to maintain Germany down, and China out; failure to do each implies that the US will grow to be an remoted rust-belt island 1000’s of miles away from the core financial block of the world.

The identical improvement additionally spells the forthcoming finish of the greenback because the world’s monetary reserve foreign money, whereas America’s time as a sole army superpower has already clearly ended. This can be a traditional instance of the Thucydides’ Entice, the second when an rising energy threatens to displace an current nice energy because the hegemon of the age, a transition which all too usually is accompanied by a battle of desperation…..

the Washington policy-makers… know that Nord Stream 2 is about way over a mutually useful power buying and selling relationship between Germany and Russia. Within the shorter time period, it additionally spells additional monetary catastrophe for the already failed shopper state of Ukraine. Long term, Nord Stream heralds a steadily nearer relationship between Germany and Russia, which might in flip be an enormous step in direction of the creation of a large Eurasian free-trade block.” (“Ukraine Implementing Minsk Accords & Ending Conflict ‘Very Last’ Thing US, UK Want, Ex-MEP Says”, Nick Griffin, The Unz Evaluation)

Readers might have seen that Griffin does contemplate the chance that Russia is likely to be the instigator of the present disaster. Why is that?

It’s as a result of it isn’t doable, it’s that easy. As we’ve identified, Washington has every part to achieve from a battle in Ukraine, whereas Russia has every part to lose. If Washington’s plan succeeds, Russia shall be additional remoted and demonized, its industrial relations with Germany shall be terminated, and will probably be universally scorned as a bloodthirsty and tyrannical warmonger. How does any of this profit Russia?

It doesn’t, and but, that is the present path of US coverage, a coverage that’s dramatically shaping the general public’s notion of Russia whereas ignoring Washington’s conspicuous makes an attempt to strengthen its management over Europe and tighten its grip on the levers of world energy.

So, how does one break the media’s spell so that individuals can see what is absolutely happening? How will we elevate consciousness of the geopolitical gamesmanship that’s taking part in out behind the smokescreen of disinformation? How will we reduce by the media’s prodigious mountain of baloney and decide who’s chargeable for the present disaster and who isn’t?

It ought to be simple, in any case, we’ve all seen this efficiency many occasions earlier than. By now, folks ought to have a good suggestion of what’s happening. And– in the event that they don’t– then, maybe, we will refresh their recollections by asking a number of easy questions that may make clear the motives and historic habits of the primary actors, the USA and Russia. That should do the trick. That ought to assist us to see which nation is instigating the provocations, and which nation isn’t. Which nation is fueling the disaster and which nation is making an attempt to place out the flames.

So, what will we learn about these two international locations from previous expertise? How do they conduct their respective international insurance policies? Do they comply with the clearly-written “worldwide” guidelines prohibiting international interference, army intervention and aggression or do they act unilaterally at any time when it serves their pursuits whatever the destruction, mayhem and loss of life it could trigger?

Answering these questions will raise us above the flustering din of the institution media. It should assist us to see that we’re not evaluating one peaceable, law-abiding nation to a different peaceable, law-abiding nation. We’re evaluating one nation that scrupulously follows the principles whether or not it’s handy or not, to a different that invariably reveals utter contempt for the essential ideas of worldwide regulation. Whereas Russia has by no means launched a battle of aggression, the US has initiated a collection of conflicts which have plunged huge swathes of the Center East and Central Asia into anarchy and destroy. Thus, the aim of this questionnaire is to permit readers to mull-over the info as everyone knows them, and decide for themselves the place the supply of the present disaster originates.

Query 1– Which of those two international locations has launched– or helped to launch– army interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Serbia and Syria?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 2– Which of those two international locations constructed detention amenities at Bagram Air Drive Base (Afghanistan), Abu Ghraib (Iraq), and Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), the place prisoners have been routinely subjected to vile and abusive remedy in violation of the Geneva Conventions?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 3– Which of the 2 international locations fabricated a pretext for invading Iraq killing tens of 1000’s of Iraqis within the course of?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 4– Which of those two international locations has toppled or tried to topple over 50 regimes because the finish of World Battle 2?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 5– Which of those two international locations has 800 army bases in international locations world wide?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 6– Which of those two international locations is extra inclined to make use of army power to attain its geopolitical goals?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 7– Which of the 2 international locations has repeatedly used false flags as a pretext for launching army interventions? (Be aware: “Keep in mind the Maine”, Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, Saddam’s WMD, Assad’s chemical weapons assaults, Gaddafi’s Viagra-crazed rape squads, and many others)

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 8– Which of the 2 international locations is constructing nuclear missile websites on the opposite county’s border placing their foremost city facilities simply 10 minutes away from nuclear annihilation?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 9– Which of those two counties (in keeping with latest surveys) pose “the best risk to world peace” and symbolize “the best risk to democracy”?

  1. Russia
  2. America

(Be aware: Based on the survey outcomes: “The US was the overwhelming choice for the country that represents the greatest threat to peace in the world today.” Additionally, “Threat to Democracy?” Guardian)

Query 10– Which is these two international locations imposes onerous financial sanctions (that are a violation of WTO guidelines and laws) on any nation that poses a risk to its world primacy?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 11– Which of those two international locations “has by no means attacked anybody all through its historical past”?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 12– Which nation has offered army advisors and cutting-edge weaponry to the Ukrainian Military to allow them to invade east Ukraine and kill ethnic Russians?

  1. Russia
  2. America

Query 13– Which nation’s media fails to report that the Ukrainian military is presently shelling ethnic Russians within the jap a part of the nation?

  1. The Russian media
  2. The western media

Query 14– Which nation’s media continues to repeat unverified claims of a “Russian invasion” whereas ignoring the buildup of Ukrainian fight troops (on the “Line of Contact”) which might be planning an enormous ethnic cleaning operation in east Ukraine?

  1. The Russian media
  2. The western media

Query 15– Which nation’s media sustained a 4 year-long disinformation marketing campaign alleging that the opposite nation had hacked their presidential election and adjusted the result?

  1. The Russian media
  2. The western media

Query 16– Which nation’s media has proved to be a extra dependable supply of knowledge and doesn’t operate because the propaganda organ of the state disseminating unverified claims gathered from the corrupted Intelligence companies who unquestioningly parrot the screwball narratives concocted by their globalist paymasters?

  1. The Russian media
  2. The western media

Query 17– (Additional Credit score) Which nation’s president is extra prone to lead his nation right into a catastrophic battle that shall be remembered as “the best strategic catastrophe in his nation’s historical past”?

  1. Vladimir Putin
  2. Joe Biden

The purpose of this text is to not bash the USA, however to offer historic proof displaying the stark distinction between Washington’s strategy to international coverage and Russia’s. The questions are supposed to assist the reader evaluate the historic info– as everyone knows them– and determine for himself if the perpetrator of the present disaster is extra prone to be the USA or Russia. The proof– we expect– clearly means that the blame lies with Washington, which is conducting one other regionally-destabilizing operation geared toward strengthening its grip on world energy.

Swansong for the New American Century?

For what it’s value, we anticipate this operation to backfire spectacularly triggering violent ructions within the equities and bond markets that nobody within the Biden administration has anticipated. It should additionally inflict irreparable injury to the threadbare Transatlantic Alliance resulting in the final word disintegration of NATO. Even America’s most die-hard allies shall be compelled to revisit their relations with Washington to find out whether or not the reputational dangers exceed the marginal advantages. 30-years of relentless aggression, unilateralism and coercion has pushed the nation in direction of a disaster completely of its personal making.

We are actually on the level of utmost hazard introduced on by feckless leaders who fail to acknowledge their very own incompetence, their very own hubris, and their very own failures. America has been sowing dragons-teeth for the higher a part of the final century, and now Joe Biden is marching the nation in direction of an unlucky second of reckoning. God assist us all.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here