UNHCR ‘firmly’ opposing UK-Rwanda offshore migration processing deal


In an preliminary response, UNHCR spelled out that it was not a celebration to negotiations which have taken place between London and Kigali, which it’s understood had been a part of an financial improvement partnership.

in article 1

In keeping with information experiences, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, has mentioned the scheme costing round $160 million, would “save numerous lives” from human trafficking, and the usually treacherous water crossing between southern England and the French coast, generally known as the English Channel.

UNHCR stays firmly against preparations that search to switch refugees and asylum seekers to 3rd nations within the absence of ample safeguards and requirements,” said UNHCR’s Assistant High Commissioner for Protection, Gillian Triggs, describing the preparations as shifting asylum obligations and evading worldwide obligations which can be “opposite to the letter and spirit of the Refugee Convention.”

Stand in solidarity

UNHCR urged each nations to re-think the scheme, warning that as a substitute of deterring refugees from perilous journeys, the externalization preparations would solely amplify dangers, inflicting refugees to hunt different routes, and exacerbate pressures on frontline States migrants are looking for to go by means of.

Whereas Rwanda has for many years generously supplied a protected haven to refugees fleeing battle and persecution, the bulk reside in camps with restricted entry to financial alternatives.

UNHCR underscored that wealthier nations should present solidarity in supporting Rwanda and the refugees it already hosts, and never the opposite approach round.

Individuals fleeing conflict, battle and persecution deserve compassion and empathy,” underscored Ms. Triggs. “They shouldn’t be traded like commodities and transferred overseas for processing”.

UNHCR mentioned in its assertion that the UK has an obligation to make sure entry for asylum seekers – integrating these deemed to be refugees and safely returning to their nation of origin, individuals with no authorized foundation to remain.

Nevertheless, Britain is as a substitute adopting preparations that abdicate duty to others, thus threatening the worldwide refugee safety regime that has stood the check of time and saved hundreds of thousands of lives over the many years.

Handle sanctuary

The UK has usually supported UNHCR, offering vital contributions that assist shield refugees and assist nations in conflicts, together with Ukraine, the company famous.

Nevertheless, monetary assist overseas for sure refugee crises can not exchange the duty of States and the duty to obtain asylum seekers and shield refugees on their very own territory – regardless of race, nationality and mode of arrival, the UN company pressured.

Whereas UNHCR acknowledges the challenges posed by pressured displacement, it maintained that developed nations host solely a fraction of the world’s refugees and have the capability to handle asylum claims in a humane, truthful and environment friendly method.

No externalizing asylum

Previously, UNHCR has additionally spoken out in opposition to Australia’s migrant offshore processing coverage, which concerned redirecting individuals on the transfer to Nauru, a Pacific island, hundreds of kilometres away.

UNHCR has made it clear it doesn’t assist the externalization of asylum by nations, together with measures taken to switch asylum-seekers and refugees to different nations, with inadequate safeguards to guard their rights, or the place this results in the shifting somewhat than the sharing of obligations to guard them.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here