Is Strategic Autonomy a Boon or Burden for India?


India has been engaged in a current flurry of diplomatic exercise. Inside a span of two weeks, New Delhi hosted Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio (March 19), Chinese language International Minister Wang Yi (March 25), and Russian International Minister Sergey Lavrov (April 1), in addition to holding a digital assembly between Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (March 21) and his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi. Throughout this era New Delhi additionally hosted the international ministers of Austria, Greece, Oman, and Mexico, in addition to the U.S. under-secretary for political affairs, EU particular envoy for the Indo-Pacific, German nationwide safety advisor, U.Ok. international secretary, and U.S. deputy nationwide safety advisor. 

in article 1

On the face of it, this could vindicate India’s significance to the worldwide system at a time of heightened geopolitical volatility related to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. India’s longstanding dedication to non-alignment (and its post-Chilly Struggle variants of strategic autonomy/omni- or multi-alignment) imply that it has been courted by each side of an more and more polarized worldwide system. The conferences with the Japanese and Australian prime ministers and European and U.S. officers had been aimed toward making certain New Delhi’s participation in punitive actions in opposition to Russia, together with lowering Indian reliance on Russian military hardware and oil imports. In the meantime, visits by the Chinese language and Russian international ministers had been aimed toward sustaining India’s impartial stance and circumventing Western sanctions by a proposed ruble-rupee funds mechanism. Lavrov additionally spoke of a “Eurasian Partnership” rooted in a typical worldview by Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi within the growth of a multipolar world order and cooperation by regional initiatives such because the BRICS, China-India-Russia trilateral, and Shanghai Cooperation Group (SCO). 

Nonetheless, regardless of these developments India dangers turning into more and more marginalized in an rising world order marked by renewed bifurcation fueled by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the China-U.S. strategic rivalry. Developments within the Indo-Pacific may be seen as a microcosm of this. On the one hand, India maintains an official dedication to an open and inclusive regional structure embedded within the precept of “ASEAN centrality,” which is turning into more and more irrelevant. On the similar time, New Delhi maintains lukewarm assist of extra unique and functionally pushed plurilateral groupings, such because the Quad the place New Delhi stays unwilling to turn into enmeshed in additional institutionalized regional initiatives akin to the Five Eyes or AUKUS. The Ukraine disaster has exacerbated these pressures as India has been labeled a “shaky” member” of the Quad after being the odd man out when it comes to its place on Russia. This locations India is within the unenviable place of turning into more and more marginalized within the rising regional structure.

India’s Marginal Function in Key International Flashpoints

Globally, whereas India is nicely positioned to be a key participant in a number of key geopolitical flashpoints, in actuality its function has typically been marginal at finest. For example, India must be a celebration to the Foreign Ministers’ Dialogue comprising nations bordering Afghanistan. It’s because India technically borders Afghanistan because the Pakistan-occupied territory of Gilgit Baltistan, which is claimed by India, is adjoining to Afghanistan. New Delhi additionally has a direct curiosity in making certain that Afghanistan doesn’t fall again into destitution and battle following the U.S. and NATO withdrawal in 2021, which might make it ripe for falling beneath the renewed affect of external powers that would problem India’s pursuits and safety. However India has been persistently shut out of the conferences, together with the newest iteration hosted by China in March.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Equally, India is nicely positioned to play a distinguished function within the peace and denuclearization course of on the Korean Peninsula as a rustic sustaining diplomatic relations with each North and South Korea. New Delhi additionally has vested pursuits arising from the symbiotic relationship between Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program and North Korea’s ballistic missile program. Nonetheless, regardless of this, India has not been a celebration to varied diplomatic initiatives, together with the erstwhile six-party talks or the bigger 10-party talks. Equally, regardless of India being a detailed accomplice to each Iran and america, New Delhi has performed a marginal function in denuclearization talks as a non-party to the P5+1 course of. Once more, New Delhi has inherent pursuits in seeing a rapprochement within the Iran-U.S. relationship given India’s want to make sure low and secure vitality costs and its overwhelming dependence on oil imports from the Center East.

Most lately, India’s standing as a key accomplice to each Russia and United States has prompted strategies of New Delhi’s potential function as a “silent diplomat” within the Ukraine battle, significantly when in comparison with China whose “no limits” partnership with Russia undermines Beijing’s credibility as an neutral mediator. However as a substitute, different center powers, notably Turkey, France, and Israel, have assumed the mantle of management in driving efforts at a peace course of. In the meantime, India’s function has been largely restricted to defending its personal financial and vitality safety pursuits whereas evading doable secondary sanctions. The truth that India’s place on the battle is extra aligned with that of autocracies equivalent to China and the UAE (with all three nations abstaining of their votes within the U.N. Safety Council condemning Russia’s actions) undermines no matter rhetorical claims India has because the world’s largest democracy and defender of the liberal worldwide order.

Trying Again to Look Ahead

Claims that India’s standing as a growing nation limits its geopolitical heft don’t maintain weight because the nation performed a distinguished function within the early years of independence when it was a far poorer nation. Outstanding examples of this embrace India internet hosting the Asian Relations Conference in 1947; participation within the Eighteen Nations Conference convened in 1949 to voice opposition to Dutch “Police Motion” in Indonesia; military aid to the Burmese authorities in its marketing campaign in opposition to Karen rebels the identical 12 months; helming the Impartial Nations Repatriation Fee on the finish of the Korean War in 1953; chairmanship of the International Control Commission on Indochina following the top of the French-Indochina Struggle in 1954; and sponsoring the Bandung Convention in 1955, which grew to become the precursor to the Non-Aligned Movement. 

To make sure, a few of this will come right down to assets. An oft-quoted statistic is that till lately the scale of the Indian International Service was on par with that of Singapore. However on a extra basic degree this can be a query about India’s will to train energy. And this brings us again to India’s non-alignment/strategic autonomy standing, which has typically been interpreted as “fence sitting” and relegated the nation to irrelevance in occasions of disaster. As educational Amitav Acharya notes in his 2017 book

New Delhi seems to be nonetheless hamstrung by a imaginative and prescient deficit. At a time when lots of the authentic concepts of [India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal] Nehru… appear realizable, India appears to be nonetheless tormented by self-doubt and the burden of inherited ideologies.

These phrases are much more related at the moment as India faces an more and more polarized and bifurcated worldwide system the place there may be restricted house for nations to “sit on the fence.” 

The silver lining is that New Delhi has confirmed itself to be strategically versatile and open to realigning its posture when mandatory. For example, New Delhi’s conclusion of a free commerce cope with Australia earlier this month (which follows an settlement with UAE in February) alludes to India softening its protectionist proclivities, which was most visibly illustrated by the nation’s exit from the RCEP (Regional Complete Financial Partnership) in 2019. On the safety entrance, India’s border standoff with China since 2020 has renewed New Delhi’s enthusiasm for the Quad. Questions are additionally being raised in regards to the utility of New Delhi’s shut relationship with Moscow amid Russia’s rising dependence on and junior standing relative to China. This reduces the chance of Russia siding with India (over even preserve a impartial stance) in a future battle with China.  

On this context, it stays to be seen if India’s long-standing dedication to non-alignment/strategic autonomy will serve to strengthen or weaken its place within the rising world order.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here